Reformed Church Plant – Indianapolis

We will be holding exploratory meetings for a potential Reformed Church Plant in Central Indiana.  Our desire is to align ourselves with a Reformed denomination such as the United Reformed Churches of North America (URCNA).  Meetings will be held on the Northeast side of Indianapolis, Indiana.

Upcoming meeting dates

• February 17, 2019
• March 10, 2019
• April 28, 2019

These will be Informational Meetings with a brief Bible study. This is an opportunity to ask questions and learn about what a Reformed church plant would entail. Along with the historical ecumenical creeds, this church plant would confess the Belgic Confession of Faith (1561), Heidelberg Catechism (1563) and the Synod of Dort (1618-1619).

The Heidelberg Catechism summarizes great comfort for the Christian –

1. What is your only comfort in life and in death?

That I, with body and soul, both in life and in death, am not my own, but belong to my faithful Savior Jesus Christ, who with His precious blood has fully satisfied for all my sins, and redeemed me from all the power of the devil; and so preserves me that without the will of my Father in heaven not a hair can fall from my head; indeed, that all things must work together for my salvation. Wherefore, by His Holy Spirit, He also assures me of eternal life, and makes me heartily willing and ready from now on to live unto Him.

For further details, please contact Brad –
Email: IndyReformed AT gmail.com

 

We Distinguish…(Part 4) — Law/Gospel

YINKAHDINAY

Law-Gospel2

In this series, we are surveying some of the most important Reformed theological distinctions. These are not irrelevant or minor points of theology. Rather, these are distinctions where, if you get them wrong or ignore them, major theological disaster threatens to ensue. We need to strive for precision in our understanding of the teachings of God’s Word.

Despite being found in the Three Forms of Unity, today’s distinction has fallen on hard times. I have lost track of the number of times that I’ve heard Reformed ministers speak disparagingly of the distinction between law and gospel. I think I understand why it happens. Imagine if someone were to say, “Oh, covenant theology makes people into legalists. It’s good that we’ve broken free from the doctrine of the covenant. That doctrine has caused nothing but trouble – it just makes people self-righteous.” It’s true that the doctrine of the covenant has…

View original post 1,107 more words

Die Pêrel van Christelike Troos (1): Inleiding en oorsig

Pro Regno

Die Pêrel van Christelike Troos

(1) Inleiding en oorsig

“Christus gee aan Sy eie, wat Moses eis van sy eie.” – Petrus Dathenus

Ek het onlangs die volgende ou boekie in my boekrak herontdek:

Parel van Christelijke Troost

(gesprek over onderscheid tussen Wet en Evangelie)

deur 

Petrus Dathenus

Inleiding

Die wesentlike doel van die boek is om vir gelowiges troos te bring, deur hul reg te leer wat die regte onderskeid is tussen die Wet (Moses) en die Evangelie (Jesus). As hierdie twee sake reg verstaan word, soos die Skrif dit leer, dan is daar geen onnodige valse teenstellings of vyandskap tussen wet en evangelie, Moses en Christus, die ou en nuwer verbondsbedelings, Ou en Nuwe Testament, ens. nie.  Ja, baie duidelike onderskeid oor wat elkeen se bepaalde doel en plek is in die Woord, maar nie vyandige valse teenstellings nie.

Die teenstelling is tussen:

  • sonde vs genade, in…

View original post 2,015 more words

Faith Healing and the Sovereignty of God: C. Everett Koop

THE WORD on The Word of Faith (a GroupBlog)

Faith Healing and the Sovereignty of God

I don’t know how many operations I performed in my surgical career. I know that I performed 17,000 of one particular type, and 7,000 of another. I practiced surgery for thirty-nine years, so perhaps I performed 50,000 operations. I was successful, and patients were coming to me from all over the world. And one of the things that endeared me to the parents of my patients was the way my incisions healed. No one likes big scars, but they are especially upsetting to mothers when they appear on their children. So I set out early on to make my scars small, as short and as thin as possible. These “invisible” scars became my trademark. But was I a healer?

The secret of thin scars is to make the incision precise-no feathered edges-and in the closing, to get the edges…

View original post 3,006 more words

Theological Problems with Paul Washer

Lutheran's Blog

washer

Paul Washer is a loved preacher by many evangelicals, but his message is twisted when it comes to the Law and Gospel Distinction.

Instead of me writing too much about him and his message, though I have much to say, I’ll give some resources for those who would like to know for themselves what Paul Washer says. Fair critiques.

I’ve said for quite some time that he is in direct violation of Scripture. Look what Jesus says and then compare it to what Paul Washer does going from church to church, city to city, yanking up the weeds (tares / unbelievers) in the Church only to harm the wheat (true believers). Note what I put in bold:

He put another parable before them, saying, “The kingdom of heaven may be compared to a man who sowed good seed in his field,but while his men were sleeping, his enemy came and…

View original post 707 more words

Mega-Pastor Puts Down Person with Disabilities

Tim's Blog - Just One Train Wreck After Another

John MacArthur, in his sermon The Eyewitness Account of Creation, preaches on Genesis 1 and 2. He takes the position that these chapters record a literal and historical account of creation and that all history and science stems from the events of the opening pages of Genesis. I have no quarrel with those who hold that literal position (unless they denigrate fellow Christians who think otherwise) nor with Christians who see those passages as not literally but figuratively descriptive of God’s work in creation.

In the sermon, MacArthur compares the Genesis account with Darwinism and finds that Charles Darwin comes up short. Fair enough. Many Christians agree based on their understanding of the Bible. Yet MacArthur does not confine his sermon to preaching the Genesis passage and comparing that record to deficiencies he sees in Darwin’s theory of evolution. He instead turns to ad hominem attack on Darwin…

View original post 928 more words